Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 199

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Massachusetts (Rep. Richard Neal) totaled $11,200,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Pine Island Farm PartnershipSheffield, MA 01257$1,250,471
2Fairfields Dairy Farm LLCWilliamstown, MA 01267$933,996
3Larkin Farm LLCSheffield, MA 01257$799,974
4Turner Farms IncSouth Egremont, MA 01258$662,018
5Maple Shade Farm IncSheffield, MA 01257$565,459
6Louis T Aragi SrSheffield, MA 01257$528,778
7Broadlawn FarmAdams, MA 01220$498,146
8Twin River Farm LLCAshley Falls, MA 01222$339,402
9Chenail Brothers Dairy FarmWilliamstown, MA 01267$322,237
10Robert C Kilmer JrAshley Falls, MA 01222$301,000
11High Lawn Farm LLCLee, MA 01238$284,712
12Larkin - Batacchi FarmSheffield, MA 01257$284,056
13Jayko DairyCheshire, MA 01225$263,421
14George BeebeGreat Barrington, MA 01230$248,031
15Gary M ShepardWest Stockbridge, MA 01266$243,326
16Proctor's Bel Air Farm LLCGreat Barrington, MA 01230$221,056
17Richard H Legeyt Toby Hill FarmSheffield, MA 01257$166,044
18Echo FarmLanesboro, MA 01237$154,281
19Robert A CoonsGreat Barrington, MA 01230$135,412
20Fred HavillTyringham, MA 01264$131,293

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag