Total Disaster Programs in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 144
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating) totaled $7,417,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John G Latham Jr | Brewster, MA 02631 | $7,427 |
102 | Tony Andrews | East Falmouth, MA 02536 | $7,425 |
103 | Bryan T. Murphy | Harwich, MA 02645 | $7,138 |
104 | Ralph Tupper | Brewster, MA 02631 | $7,115 |
105 | Craig Canning | East Sandwich, MA 02537 | $6,990 |
106 | Molly Benjamin | Provincetown, MA 02657 | $6,954 |
107 | John Connors | Wellfleet, MA 02667 | $6,793 |
108 | James A Athearn | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $6,483 |
109 | Lawrence Meads | Provincetown, MA 02657 | $6,084 |
110 | Unveiled Seafood Inc | West Barnstable, MA 02668 | $6,010 |
111 | Julie Winslow | Orleans, MA 02653 | $5,324 |
112 | Island Bee Company | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $5,196 |
113 | Allen Farm Inc | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $4,692 |
114 | Andrew D Morgan | Eastham, MA 02642 | $4,553 |
115 | Todd E Lebart | Wellfleet, MA 02667 | $4,346 |
116 | Linda Letourneau | Centerville, MA 02632 | $4,317 |
117 | Gregory Dadak | Cataumet, MA 02534 | $4,035 |
118 | Andrew W Woodruff | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $4,013 |
119 | Washington E Chase | Brewster, MA 02631 | $3,743 |
120 | Ralph R Crowell | South Chatham, MA 02659 | $3,489 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”