Total Commodity Programs in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 458

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating) totaled $6,008,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Michael J ReardonE Falmouth, MA 02536$250,000
2Cape Cod Oyster Co IncMarstons Mills, MA 02648$248,264
3Bartletts Ocean View Farm IncNantucket, MA 02554$216,495
4Brown Fishing Company Inc.North Falmouth, MA 02556$196,904
5Aquacultural Research CorpDennis, MA 02638$145,910
6Handy Cranberry TrustPocasset, MA 02559$144,191
7Morning Glory Farm, Inc.Edgartown, MA 02539$119,795
8Cotuit Oyster Company IncCotuit, MA 02635$118,261
9Sandy Neck Oyster CompanyWest Barnstable, MA 02668$97,812
10Saunier's Heather Gardens, Inc.Vineyard Haven, MA 02568$93,157
11Vineyard GardensWest Tisbury, MA 02575$81,646
12Wayne R HayesHyannis, MA 02601$74,879
13Ward Aquafarms LLCNorth Falmouth, MA 02556$72,753
14Calico Lobster Co., Inc.Sandwich, MA 02563$57,706
15Signature Oyster LLCEdgartown, MA 02539$54,185
16Northern Collective IncWellfleet, MA 02667$54,083
17Chatham Shellfish CoWest Chatham, MA 02669$51,915
18David M RossWest Barnstable, MA 02668$51,022
19Bartholomew Family Bogs LLCMarion, MA 02738$48,485
20Raymond L Thacher JrSouth Dennis, MA 02660$48,247

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag