Farm Subsidy information
9th District of Massachusetts
(Rep. Bill Keating)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 555
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating) totaled $13,588,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Peter Orcutt | Orleans, MA 02653 | $591,688 |
2 | Scott D Mullin | West Barnstable, MA 02668 | $479,993 |
3 | Handy Cranberry Trust | Pocasset, MA 02559 | $428,901 |
4 | Sandy Neck Oyster Company | West Barnstable, MA 02668 | $377,368 |
5 | Cape Cod Oyster Co Inc | Osterville, MA 02655 | $363,386 |
6 | Cape Cod Oyster Co Inc | Marstons Mills, MA 02648 | $360,113 |
7 | Holbrook Oyster Ranch, Inc. | Wellfleet, MA 02667 | $321,273 |
8 | Wayne R Hayes | Hyannis, MA 02601 | $317,798 |
9 | Robert E Ashworth | West Barnstable, MA 02668 | $285,471 |
10 | Steven Caminiti | Cobleskill, NY 12043 | $279,819 |
11 | Christopher J Wood | Centerville, MA 02632 | $276,801 |
12 | Leslie A Hemmila | Barnstable, MA 02630 | $259,794 |
13 | Michael J Reardon | E Falmouth, MA 02536 | $250,000 |
14 | Ethan D Estey | South Wellfleet, MA 02663 | $230,099 |
15 | James Davenport | South Dennis, MA 02660 | $222,774 |
16 | Bartletts Ocean View Farm Inc | Nantucket, MA 02554 | $216,495 |
17 | Brown Fishing Company Inc. | North Falmouth, MA 02556 | $196,904 |
18 | Aquacultural Research Corp | Dennis, MA 02638 | $174,728 |
19 | David Flattery | Provincetown, MA 02657 | $159,343 |
20 | Karl W Maki | Nobleboro, ME 04555 | $151,896 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>