Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 535

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $4,058,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
41Wayne K BartschWarwick, MD 21912$20,613
42Walnut Hill Farms IncHurlock, MD 21643$20,609
43Larry MuellerEaston, MD 21601$20,430
44Ag Renewal Enterprises IncBerlin, MD 21811$20,000
45A N Harper & SonEast New Market, MD 21631$19,604
46Wick Brothers LtdMillington, MD 21651$19,526
47C Michael ScheelerCecilton, MD 21913$19,294
48Sidney RichardsonWillards, MD 21874$19,073
49Wm H Wilkins & SonsPocomoke City, MD 21851$19,042
50James B. Beauchamp, Sr.Pocomoke City, MD 21851$18,365
51Schmidt Farms IncSudlersville, MD 21668$18,250
52Floyd AllredColora, MD 21917$18,123
53Michael D AppenzellerSudlersville, MD 21668$18,089
54Bernice D HevelowWarwick, MD 21912$17,711
55Pine Land FarmsMarion Station, MD 21838$17,684
56Charles T BishopQueenstown, MD 21658$17,586
57Me And Jimmy IncDenton, MD 21629$17,108
58Overholt FarmsPocomoke City, MD 21851$16,923
59Wade PolkParsonsburg, MD 21849$16,497
60Charles T Craig JrEarleville, MD 21919$16,229

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag