Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 224
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $2,910,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Madhouse Oysters, LLC | Fishing Creek, MD 21634 | $12,323 |
42 | Long View Farms Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $12,054 |
43 | Henry W Snow III | Cordova, MD 21625 | $11,901 |
44 | Wesley Cohee | Preston, MD 21655 | $11,875 |
45 | Albeck Farms Inc | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $11,875 |
46 | Cecil Gannon & Sons Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $11,875 |
47 | Meadow Farm Joint Venture LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $11,875 |
48 | Robert N Taylor | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $11,875 |
49 | Chestnut Lane Farms, LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $11,875 |
50 | , | $11,875 | |
51 | Chesterville Bridge Farm, LLC | Millington, MD 21651 | $11,617 |
52 | James H Oross | Denton, MD 21629 | $11,514 |
53 | Lazy Day Farms LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $11,458 |
54 | Oksana Y Bocharova | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $10,195 |
55 | Thomas Gannon | Centreville, MD 21617 | $9,865 |
56 | Jeffrey R Brummitt | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $9,694 |
57 | Cullen Farms Inc | Crisfield, MD 21817 | $9,520 |
58 | Foxhole Farm LLC | Galena, MD 21635 | $9,477 |
59 | Barnett Farms, LLC | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $9,146 |
60 | Elsie Mae Rhodes | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $9,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”