Loan Deficiency in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,167
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $119,839,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dakota Farms Inc | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $280,167 |
62 | Donald Leager | Centreville, MD 21617 | $279,370 |
63 | C Temple Rhodes Jr | Centreville, MD 21617 | $279,032 |
64 | Harry Jones | Denton, MD 21629 | $276,354 |
65 | Chris B Breeding | Stevensville, MD 21666 | $276,058 |
66 | Ernest Fuchs | Easton, MD 21601 | $275,648 |
67 | Country Fields Inc | Centreville, MD 21617 | $273,219 |
68 | Walnut Hill Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $271,191 |
69 | Calloway Brothers | Mardela Springs, MD 21837 | $268,821 |
70 | Ljp & Sons LLC | Henderson, MD 21640 | $266,766 |
71 | Brittingham Brothers | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $265,938 |
72 | Owings And Sons Inc | Millington, MD 21651 | $264,119 |
73 | Ralph C Whaley Sr | Queenstown, MD 21658 | $262,441 |
74 | Ronald Love | Denton, MD 21629 | $255,751 |
75 | Guy Farms Inc | Hebron, MD 21830 | $254,941 |
76 | A W Owen Jr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $254,518 |
77 | Clearview Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $253,973 |
78 | George H Dryden Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $252,018 |
79 | A N Harper & Son | East New Market, MD 21631 | $250,343 |
80 | Schmidt Farms Inc | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $248,937 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”