Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 224
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $2,910,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Breckenridge Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $4,922 |
82 | Skipton Creek Farms Llp | Cordova, MD 21625 | $4,796 |
83 | Peter Leager | Galena, MD 21635 | $4,772 |
84 | Hambleton Creek Farm Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $4,439 |
85 | Quiet Acres Farm Inc | Earleville, MD 21919 | $4,193 |
86 | A & P Farms Inc | Marion Station, MD 21838 | $4,035 |
87 | Langenfelder Family Limited Partn | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $3,894 |
88 | A W Pinto Farms, Inc. | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $3,543 |
89 | Gavin Carl Roe | Easton, MD 21601 | $3,417 |
90 | Howard Clyde Harding Estate | Easton, MD 21601 | $3,352 |
91 | Charles G Robinson | North East, MD 21901 | $3,208 |
92 | Callie Olivia Cohee Hopkins | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $3,040 |
93 | Miller's Mesa Inc | Westover, MD 21871 | $3,009 |
94 | Jacob Guethler | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $2,926 |
95 | Mar Del View Farms LLC | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $2,911 |
96 | F & H Farms | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $2,612 |
97 | Staff-herd Farms | Elkton, MD 21921 | $2,525 |
98 | Price Investments Lp | Earleville, MD 21919 | $2,499 |
99 | Red Acres Hydroponics LLC | Worton, MD 21678 | $2,444 |
100 | Cutfresh Organics LLC | Eden, MD 21822 | $2,149 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”