Total Subsidies in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 8,675

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $831,575,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
101Bright Helmstone Farms IncMassey, MD 21650$1,177,163
102Vernon M CannonChurch Hill, MD 21623$1,170,569
103Jck Farms LLCQueenstown, MD 21658$1,164,504
104George H Dryden JrNewark, MD 21841$1,147,818
105Neal Farms PartnershipFederalsburg, MD 21632$1,146,371
106Ag Renewal Enterprises IncBerlin, MD 21811$1,146,323
107Emerson W Eberspacher JrCambridge, MD 21613$1,131,937
108Walnut Hill Farms IncHurlock, MD 21643$1,124,302
109Twin Oak Farms IncPocomoke City, MD 21851$1,119,228
110C J LangenfelderKennedyville, MD 21645$1,118,550
111Sharon L EatonQueen Anne, MD 21657$1,112,814
112Dakota Farms IncPrincess Anne, MD 21853$1,110,170
113Elizabeth Handley Nagel-elizabeth H. Nagel LivingVienna, MD 21869$1,109,610
114G Philip Jackson JrCambridge, MD 21613$1,109,524
115William H Cooper JrEden, MD 21822$1,106,862
116Goose Haven Enterprises LLCChestertown, MD 21620$1,100,170
117Jason L SheubrooksSudlersville, MD 21668$1,096,712
118Philip T Callahan JrCentreville, MD 21617$1,095,476
119Gregory Scott McclymentQueenstown, MD 21658$1,083,624
120Wood BrothersCentreville, MD 21617$1,079,638

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag