Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 535

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $4,058,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
101Lawrence C Thomas IncPrincess Anne, MD 21853$10,579
102Steve HurleyMardela Springs, MD 21837$10,536
103Gunther General PartnershipCentreville, MD 21617$10,500
104Roland J KarbaumChurch Hill, MD 21623$10,500
105Holt Family PartnershipElkton, MD 21921$10,396
106Collins Bros Farms IncMillsboro, DE 19966$10,383
107Robert J DixonEarleville, MD 21919$10,322
108Blair MitchellDelmar, MD 21875$10,176
109Tol-je-so Farm LLCPort Deposit, MD 21904$10,086
110F A Holland & SonsNew Church, VA 23415$9,937
111Stephen Whitney IsaacsonCecilton, MD 21913$9,701
112Ewing Brothers LLCElkton, MD 21921$9,682
113Ronald UnderwoodNorth East, MD 21901$9,674
114Holly Hill Farms IncEarleville, MD 21919$9,664
115Scot BeauchampWestover, MD 21871$9,637
116Edwin HudsonPittsville, MD 21850$9,600
117T Willard Dodd JrQueenstown, MD 21658$9,514
118Malkus FarmsCambridge, MD 21613$9,438
119Zeiset FarmsChestertown, MD 21620$9,280
120Scott SpeakeSalisbury, MD 21802$9,263

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag