Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 535

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $4,058,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
121Wallace N BishopPrincess Anne, MD 21853$9,249
122T & J FarmsMarion Station, MD 21838$9,230
123F Kevin LeavertonCentreville, MD 21617$9,204
124Charles S MooreNorth East, MD 21901$9,144
125J D FarmsCambridge, MD 21613$9,049
126John O MurphyEaston, MD 21601$9,000
127Almodington IncFruitland, MD 21826$8,953
128Mac Farms IncRhodesdale, MD 21659$8,900
129Brittingham BrothersMarion Station, MD 21838$8,877
130Donna LairdCrisfield, MD 21817$8,680
131James E EastPocomoke City, MD 21851$8,679
132Nicholas E BarnesPort Deposit, MD 21904$8,264
133Lawrence E JesterTownsend, DE 19734$8,220
134Masons Heritage IncQueen Anne, MD 21657$8,170
135Lankford Farms PartnershipPocomoke City, MD 21851$8,166
136Reginald Sellers JrVienna, MD 21869$8,156
137Lawrence C ThomasPrincess Anne, MD 21853$7,994
138Thomas J Johnson IIISnow Hill, MD 21863$7,877
139Eugene R KurtzPocomoke City, MD 21851$7,810
140William H Steele JrConowingo, MD 21918$7,807

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag