Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Maryland
(Rep. Andy Harris)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 8,675
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $831,575,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Everett D Holland & Sons Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,779,365 |
42 | Elsie Mae Rhodes | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $1,763,775 |
43 | Aydelotte Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $1,746,425 |
44 | Grand View Farm LLC | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $1,722,459 |
45 | Wimberly Farms Inc | Princess Anne, MD 21853 | $1,717,591 |
46 | F A Holland & Sons | New Church, VA 23415 | $1,711,446 |
47 | Michael R Bostic | Church Hill, MD 21623 | $1,711,244 |
48 | Hunt Ray Farms | Centreville, MD 21617 | $1,683,717 |
49 | Garland T Swann & Sons LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $1,667,002 |
50 | D R Mcdonald & Sons Inc | Kennedyville, MD 21645 | $1,666,180 |
51 | Neal Farms Inc | Federalsburg, MD 21632 | $1,623,830 |
52 | Harry A Eaton | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $1,609,789 |
53 | Leager Farms | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $1,600,856 |
54 | Schmidt Farms Inc | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $1,557,147 |
55 | Clearview Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $1,521,449 |
56 | D Mark Eberspacher | East New Market, MD 21631 | $1,502,366 |
57 | Patterson Farms Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $1,497,179 |
58 | John Swaine III | Royal Oak, MD 21662 | $1,496,082 |
59 | Hans Asmussen & Sons Inc | Trappe, MD 21673 | $1,471,590 |
60 | William J Kimbles V | Centreville, MD 21617 | $1,461,779 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”