Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Maryland
(Rep. Andy Harris)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,722
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Maryland (Rep. Andy Harris) totaled $30,976,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quantico Creek Sod Farms Inc | Salisbury, MD 21801 | $525,978 |
| 2 | Harborview Farms | Rock Hall, MD 21661 | $335,539 |
| 3 | Kilby Farms LLC | Colora, MD 21917 | $289,809 |
| 4 | Moon Nurseries, Inc. | Chesapeake City, MD 21915 | $261,526 |
| 5 | James Nelson Farms Inc | Westover, MD 21871 | $260,225 |
| 6 | Eric Lawrence Hignutt | Henderson, MD 21640 | $251,855 |
| 7 | Jvw Investments LLC | Earleville, MD 21919 | $250,000 |
| 8 | Fred R Moore & Son Inc | Eden, MD 21822 | $227,374 |
| 9 | Smith Family Limited Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $188,148 |
| 10 | Oakwood Sod Farm Inc | Delmar, MD 21875 | $182,540 |
| 11 | Fair Hill Farms Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $174,679 |
| 12 | Oakland View Farms LLC | Ridgely, MD 21660 | $168,274 |
| 13 | P Thomas Mason | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $166,848 |
| 14 | Patterson Farms Inc | Chestertown, MD 21620 | $162,318 |
| 15 | Central Sod Farm Of Md Inc | Centreville, MD 21617 | $158,695 |
| 16 | David Good | Greensboro, MD 21639 | $157,869 |
| 17 | Chesapeake Gold Farms Inc | North East, MD 21901 | $138,581 |
| 18 | Leager Farms | Sudlersville, MD 21668 | $138,479 |
| 19 | Vernon S Horst | Rising Sun, MD 21911 | $129,498 |
| 20 | Lester C Jones & Sons Inc | Massey, MD 21650 | $127,751 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf