Production Flexibility Program in 5th District of Maryland (Rep. Steny Hoyer), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 453
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 5th District of Maryland (Rep. Steny Hoyer) totaled $3,307,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul A Tennyson | Ridge, MD 20680 | $35,715 |
22 | Plainfield Farms | Newburg, MD 20664 | $35,198 |
23 | Parran B Briscoe | Saint Leonard, MD 20685 | $34,685 |
24 | Cage Farms | Saint Leonard, MD 20685 | $33,276 |
25 | T A Stickel | Nanjemoy, MD 20662 | $32,265 |
26 | Susan D Hance-wells | Prince Frederick, MD 20678 | $31,319 |
27 | Donald P Tennyson | Dameron, MD 20628 | $30,178 |
28 | Patrick W Adams | Lexington Park, MD 20653 | $28,627 |
29 | Joseph B Trossbach Jr | Dameron, MD 20628 | $27,793 |
30 | Michael C Granados | Huntingtown, MD 20639 | $27,602 |
31 | George B Beavan | Chaptico, MD 20621 | $27,184 |
32 | Lawrence T Wolfe | Chaptico, MD 20621 | $26,793 |
33 | William G Helwig | Nanjemoy, MD 20662 | $26,677 |
34 | Walter M Golden | Nanjemoy, MD 20662 | $25,578 |
35 | Thomas P Trossbach | Dameron, MD 20628 | $23,024 |
36 | Earl F Hance | Port Republic, MD 20676 | $22,585 |
37 | Kenneth Burroughs | Mechanicsville, MD 20659 | $21,516 |
38 | Anthony G Flerlage | Waldorf, MD 20601 | $21,335 |
39 | John D Briscoe Est | Saint Leonard, MD 20685 | $21,082 |
40 | Raymond M Norris | California, MD 20619 | $20,581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”