Biomass Crop Assistance Program in 2nd District of Maine (Rep. Jared Golden), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 61

Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Maine (Rep. Jared Golden) totaled $23,885,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Biomass Crop Assistance Program
1995-2023
21Portage Wood ProductsPortage, ME 04768$319,904
22Dean Young Forestry, Inc.Franklin, ME 04634$270,696
23Red Shield Acquisition LLCOld Town, ME 04468$270,033
24Gary Pomery IncHermon, ME 04401$248,504
25E D Bessey & SonHinckley, ME 04944$245,267
26Applied Forestry IncCornville, ME 04976$239,523
27On The Edge Chipping IncPhillips, ME 04966$235,216
28Stratton Lumber IncStratton, ME 04982$191,151
29E R Caton & Son Trucking IncPhillips, ME 04966$188,905
30J L Brochu IncStratton, ME 04982$159,400
31Dmg EnterprisesPembroke, ME 04666$156,401
32Sebasticook Farms/sebasticook LumSaint Albans, ME 04971$150,912
33Log Land Forest Products CorpNorridgewock, ME 04957$130,594
34Plum Creek Marketing IncCrossett, AR 71635$123,998
35Hardwood Products Company LpGuilford, ME 04443$116,992
36A W Chaffee IncOakland, ME 04963$104,842
37Morrison Forest Product IncHarmony, ME 04942$86,232
38Mdp Transportation IncEastport, ME 04631$82,853
39L R Hamilton Land Services IncPrinceton, ME 04668$80,805
40Cousineau Forest Products IncHenniker, NH 03242$75,347

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag