Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Maine (Rep. Jared Golden), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 428
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Maine (Rep. Jared Golden) totaled $8,303,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lajoie Growers LLC | Van Buren, ME 04785 | $27,088 |
62 | Marquis Farms, Inc. | Van Buren, ME 04785 | $26,785 |
63 | Maurice B Magoon Jr | Skowhegan, ME 04976 | $26,025 |
64 | Ward & Stephanie Mclaughlin | Mars Hill, ME 04758 | $25,850 |
65 | David S Krebs | Starks, ME 04911 | $25,321 |
66 | Buck Family Farms, LLC | Mapleton, ME 04757 | $25,036 |
67 | Vaughn L Chase | Mapleton, ME 04757 | $24,437 |
68 | Daniel O Hurd Jr | Dover Foxcroft, ME 04426 | $23,716 |
69 | Roger Aaron Whitney | Corinna, ME 04928 | $23,621 |
70 | Joel Huff | Wellington, ME 04942 | $23,175 |
71 | Erabliere J.v. Inc. | Westbury, J0B 1 | $22,802 |
72 | Bedard Morissette Sugar Camp | Jackman, ME 04945 | $22,414 |
73 | Daniel E Lyman | Norridgewock, ME 04957 | $22,391 |
74 | Rodrigue Maple 1 Inc | Ste Justine, G0R 1 | $22,216 |
75 | Carrier Sugar Bush LLC | Levis, G6K 1 | $22,156 |
76 | Stephen Morrison | Charleston, ME 04422 | $21,749 |
77 | Golden Harvest Farms Inc. | Mapleton, ME 04757 | $21,669 |
78 | Matthew A Griffeth | Limestone, ME 04750 | $21,667 |
79 | 9109-1785 Quebec Inc | Saint-evariste, G0M 1 | $20,218 |
80 | Kenney-porter Seed Farms Inc | Presque Isle, ME 04769 | $19,989 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”