Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 273
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $282,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jim Meyers | Bark River, MI 49807 | $2,933 |
22 | Mark Basel | Hillman, MI 49746 | $2,865 |
23 | Thomas Piche | Nadeau, MI 49863 | $2,746 |
24 | Tyler David Idalski | Rogers City, MI 49779 | $2,621 |
25 | John Hill | Brimley, MI 49715 | $2,479 |
26 | Lakeview Hills Organic Farm LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $2,462 |
27 | Robert L Love | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $2,400 |
28 | Andrea M Mcdonald | Pickford, MI 49774 | $2,384 |
29 | Cherry Beach Orchards LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,323 |
30 | Harvest Thyme Farm & Vineyards, L | Cheboygan, MI 49721 | $2,284 |
31 | Gary W Rasmussen | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $2,270 |
32 | Terry Grondine | Hermansville, MI 49847 | $2,120 |
33 | Sunblossom Orchards LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $2,009 |
34 | Kevin T Klink | Garden, MI 49835 | $2,007 |
35 | Wilson Farm | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $1,805 |
36 | Nicholas Bruder | Millersburg, MI 49759 | $1,769 |
37 | Justin Timm | Lachine, MI 49753 | $1,697 |
38 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,662 |
39 | Law Suit Acres LLC | Posen, MI 49776 | $1,657 |
40 | James R Love | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $1,539 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”