Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Michigan
(Rep. Jack Bergman)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 497
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $10,336,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Pellegrini | Escanaba, MI 49829 | $63,099 |
42 | Gregory Gilroy | Arcadia, MI 49613 | $62,383 |
43 | Kieth Campeau | Brimley, MI 49715 | $61,763 |
44 | Gallagher Farms LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $61,469 |
45 | Fredrickson Farm | Northport, MI 49670 | $61,259 |
46 | E Michael Fairchild | Drummond Island, MI 49726 | $58,927 |
47 | Hallstedt Homestead LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $57,562 |
48 | Greg Williams | Cedar, MI 49621 | $57,464 |
49 | Bucks & Beans Farm | Posen, MI 49776 | $56,596 |
50 | , | $51,975 | |
51 | , | $51,975 | |
52 | Cjt & Sons Grain Farms LLC | Rogers City, MI 49779 | $50,190 |
53 | James Eckerle | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $48,425 |
54 | Anthony W Bergstrom | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $48,313 |
55 | Send & Emeott LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $47,159 |
56 | Spencer Shunk Jr | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $47,101 |
57 | , | $46,676 | |
58 | Kevin L Bargy | Kewadin, MI 49648 | $46,433 |
59 | Godfrey Farms Inc | Hillman, MI 49746 | $45,677 |
60 | Brian Altonen | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $44,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”