Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Michigan
(Rep. Jack Bergman)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 497
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $10,336,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Brian Martineau | Williamsburg, MI 49690 | $42,076 |
62 | Shimp Ranch | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $41,746 |
63 | Keweenaw Bay Indian Community | Baraga, MI 49908 | $40,056 |
64 | Larry A Lathwell | Frankfort, MI 49635 | $39,975 |
65 | Gary Wayne Lathwell | Frankfort, MI 49635 | $39,975 |
66 | Kirk Eckerle | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $39,831 |
67 | Skyline Orchard Of Frankfort | Elberta, MI 49628 | $38,157 |
68 | Debacker Family Dairy Farm LLC | Daggett, MI 49821 | $36,974 |
69 | Sunblossom Orchards LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $35,037 |
70 | Kiessel Farms LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $34,902 |
71 | Vermeersch Farms LLC | Central Lake, MI 49622 | $34,754 |
72 | Gallagher Family Estate Inc | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $34,019 |
73 | Jonathan Richter | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $33,461 |
74 | Jelinek Orchards LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $32,403 |
75 | , | $32,285 | |
76 | Charles E Parker | Norway, MI 49870 | $31,639 |
77 | Egeler's Red Acres LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $31,410 |
78 | , | $30,767 | |
79 | Gallaghers Vineyard And Winery Corp | Cedar, MI 49621 | $29,807 |
80 | , | $28,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”