Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 273
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $282,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Daryl Allen Leese | Pickford, MI 49774 | $909 |
82 | Daniel G Hall | Rock, MI 49880 | $893 |
83 | Kiessel Orchards LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $889 |
84 | Alfred Gareau | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $876 |
85 | Kieth Campeau | Brimley, MI 49715 | $866 |
86 | Mark Mellgren | Stephenson, MI 49887 | $850 |
87 | Stuart R Delene | Watton, MI 49970 | $844 |
88 | Tammy Niarhos | Wilson, MI 49896 | $816 |
89 | , | $813 | |
90 | Shimp Ranch | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $800 |
91 | Pk Farms LLC | Green Bay, WI 54311 | $792 |
92 | , | $790 | |
93 | Crystal Meier | Atlanta, MI 49709 | $757 |
94 | Judith L Guinan | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $754 |
95 | La Casa Verde Produce, LLC | Cedar, MI 49621 | $744 |
96 | Mayer Performance Horses | Rudyard, MI 49780 | $738 |
97 | Kulpa Farms LLC | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $730 |
98 | Circle S Farms | Pickford, MI 49774 | $724 |
99 | Tassier Sugar Bush Inc | Cedarville, MI 49719 | $715 |
100 | Robert Eitzen | Cedar, MI 49621 | $711 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”