Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 576
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $730,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Matthew J Kempker | Chatham, MI 49816 | $1,991 |
102 | Caleb Acciacca | Baraga, MI 49908 | $1,991 |
103 | Mark Aube | Ossineke, MI 49766 | $1,975 |
104 | Steve Acciacca | Baraga, MI 49908 | $1,930 |
105 | Law Suit Acres LLC | Posen, MI 49776 | $1,904 |
106 | Taylor Creek Farm LLC | Pickford, MI 49774 | $1,897 |
107 | Thomas Piche | Nadeau, MI 49863 | $1,892 |
108 | Kelli M Stapleton | Garden, MI 49835 | $1,891 |
109 | Lynda Conant | Central Lake, MI 49622 | $1,853 |
110 | Neil William Peffers | Pickford, MI 49774 | $1,845 |
111 | Matt Guindon | Cornell, MI 49818 | $1,837 |
112 | John Michael Bradley | Hillman, MI 49746 | $1,830 |
113 | Tony's Custom Butchering | Herron, MI 49744 | $1,826 |
114 | Brian T Hunt | Lachine, MI 49753 | $1,815 |
115 | Joseph Sobek | Hawks, MI 49743 | $1,814 |
116 | Adolph Schiller | Ossineke, MI 49766 | $1,808 |
117 | Cotey Cattle & Land | Rapid River, MI 49878 | $1,806 |
118 | James A Trojanek | East Jordan, MI 49727 | $1,803 |
119 | Alan Spaulding | Garden, MI 49835 | $1,798 |
120 | Glen A Cryderman | Pickford, MI 49774 | $1,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”