Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 273
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $282,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Stacey L Kempker | Chatham, MI 49816 | $693 |
102 | Jason Timm | Hubbard Lake, MI 49747 | $689 |
103 | Beth Ann Buhr | Cheboygan, MI 49721 | $678 |
104 | Willis Family Maple Farm LLC | Iron River, MI 49935 | $675 |
105 | Ciccone Vineyards & Winery LLC | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $655 |
106 | Laura Brosius | Skandia, MI 49885 | $647 |
107 | Guy Thomas Beaton | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $645 |
108 | Joseph Sobek | Hawks, MI 49743 | $644 |
109 | Denise Thiem | Hubbard Lake, MI 49747 | $638 |
110 | Nancy Kowalski | Alpena, MI 49707 | $622 |
111 | Kelli M Stapleton | Garden, MI 49835 | $602 |
112 | Robert J Schwiderson | Dafter, MI 49724 | $586 |
113 | Randy Strohschein | Hillman, MI 49746 | $584 |
114 | Pirmans Corner Farm Inc | Skandia, MI 49885 | $582 |
115 | David C Smith | Crystal Falls, MI 49920 | $573 |
116 | Bryce Wallis | Pickford, MI 49774 | $571 |
117 | Darin Wallis | Pickford, MI 49774 | $571 |
118 | Lisa Butkovich | Engadine, MI 49827 | $565 |
119 | David Love | Dafter, MI 49724 | $562 |
120 | James T Chambers | Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783 | $561 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”