Biomass Crop Assistance Program in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 102
Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $6,595,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Biomass Crop Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wood Fiber Inc | Niagara, WI 54151 | $743,211 |
| 2 | Norman Pestka Construction Inc | Ontonagon, MI 49953 | $735,167 |
| 3 | Plum Creek Marketing Inc | Crossett, AR 71635 | $587,372 |
| 4 | St John Forest Products Inc | Spalding, MI 49886 | $420,328 |
| 5 | Wjz And Sons Harvesting Inc | Germfask, MI 49836 | $306,527 |
| 6 | J Carey Logging Inc | Channing, MI 49815 | $266,391 |
| 7 | Marvin Nelson Forest Products Inc | Cornell, MI 49818 | $249,265 |
| 8 | Holli Forest Products, Inc. | Ishpeming, MI 49849 | $213,943 |
| 9 | Upper Peninsula Timber Co LLC | Au Train, MI 49806 | $205,176 |
| 10 | Stuckman Tree Service Inc | Gaylord, MI 49734 | $185,337 |
| 11 | Zellar Harvesting LLC | Gulliver, MI 49840 | $134,289 |
| 12 | Kleiman Forest Products Inc | Wilson, MI 49896 | $114,090 |
| 13 | Northern Timberlands Inc | Vanderbilt, MI 49795 | $112,501 |
| 14 | Schleben Forest Products Inc | Rogers City, MI 49779 | $112,491 |
| 15 | Rpr Contractors And Equipment Co | Escanaba, MI 49829 | $109,432 |
| 16 | Kanerva Forest Products Inc | Rock, MI 49880 | $100,363 |
| 17 | Michigan Lumber And Wood Fiber In | Comins, MI 48619 | $91,097 |
| 18 | Eh Tulgestka & Sons Inc | Rogers City, MI 49779 | $88,708 |
| 19 | Minerick Logging Inc | Sagola, MI 49881 | $88,589 |
| 20 | Precision Forestry | Onaway, MI 49765 | $81,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
