Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 158
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) totaled $3,193,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Peter Kleiman | Wilson, MI 49896 | $50,000 |
22 | Beverly Ann Nault | Escanaba, MI 49829 | $50,000 |
23 | Jeffrey A Debacker | Cornell, MI 49818 | $50,000 |
24 | John A Rappette | Cornell, MI 49818 | $50,000 |
25 | Kevin Richard | Hawks, MI 49743 | $50,000 |
26 | John Vandermissen | Wilson, MI 49896 | $50,000 |
27 | Fred Werth | Alpena, MI 49707 | $49,900 |
28 | Mark Nachtman | Ellsworth, MI 49729 | $49,714 |
29 | Larry Piwarski | Iron River, MI 49935 | $49,490 |
30 | E Scott Bellmore | Hermansville, MI 49847 | $45,650 |
31 | Stoney Point Orchards Inc | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $45,489 |
32 | David R Hayes | Rock, MI 49880 | $45,431 |
33 | Melodydell Dairy LLC | Vulcan, MI 49892 | $42,499 |
34 | Jeff Send | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $42,000 |
35 | Joseph Bower | Bark River, MI 49807 | $41,584 |
36 | Tim Devooght | Skandia, MI 49885 | $38,923 |
37 | Bill Devooght | Marquette, MI 49855 | $38,849 |
38 | Michael J Iho | Trenary, MI 49891 | $37,575 |
39 | George Servia | Norway, MI 49870 | $37,287 |
40 | Tim Bal | Hermansville, MI 49847 | $36,906 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”