Farm Subsidy information
4th District of Michigan
(Rep. John Moolenaar)
Total Subsidies in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 581
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar) totaled $6,275,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Andrew J Babosh | Coleman, MI 48618 | $63,848 |
22 | , | $61,368 | |
23 | Pleasant Valley Organics LLC | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $57,437 |
24 | Samuel G Hostetler | Clare, MI 48617 | $56,772 |
25 | Maple Leaf Farms LLC | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $55,427 |
26 | Cloyd A Cordray | Ashley, MI 48806 | $50,527 |
27 | William Scott Moss | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $49,280 |
28 | Bradley L Baxter | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $47,750 |
29 | J & D's Busy Bees LLC | Alma, MI 48801 | $47,671 |
30 | Tim Bissell & Lee Burk Ptr-b & B Farms | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $46,352 |
31 | Chad Peters | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $44,238 |
32 | Scott Peterson | Marion, MI 49665 | $44,210 |
33 | Adam J Thomas | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $43,795 |
34 | Gregory Porubsky | Bannister, MI 48807 | $43,130 |
35 | Gary Noble | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $39,482 |
36 | Wagester Farms LLC | Remus, MI 49340 | $37,131 |
37 | Pasch Farms LLC | Weidman, MI 48893 | $36,469 |
38 | Kendall English | Breckenridge, MI 48615 | $36,004 |
39 | Troy E Haynes | Middleton, MI 48856 | $36,003 |
40 | Engler Dairy Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $35,384 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”