Counter Cyclical Program in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,123
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar) totaled $8,864,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steven R Bovee | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $36,809 |
42 | J R - Farms | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $36,546 |
43 | Mc Clintic Farms | Alma, MI 48801 | $36,342 |
44 | Finnerty Beef Farms Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $36,061 |
45 | Jeff Bosley | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $36,060 |
46 | G&r Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $36,041 |
47 | L Raymond Wilson & Sons LLC | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $34,784 |
48 | Gary Cumberworth | Perrinton, MI 48871 | $34,048 |
49 | Weburg Farms Inc | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $33,988 |
50 | James Lester Cary | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $32,795 |
51 | David Upton | Perrinton, MI 48871 | $32,443 |
52 | Timothy J Swanson | Bannister, MI 48807 | $30,219 |
53 | Audrey Swanson | Bannister, MI 48807 | $30,219 |
54 | Judge Dairy Farm Inc | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $30,035 |
55 | Hiram Gene Waldron | Sumner, MI 48889 | $29,996 |
56 | Gary Baxter | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $29,928 |
57 | Roger Gable | Middleton, MI 48856 | $29,881 |
58 | Strong-kellogg Homestead Farms LLC | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $29,468 |
59 | Theodore James Wilk | Alma, MI 48801 | $29,269 |
60 | Bigelows Hilltop Farm | Elwell, MI 48832 | $29,042 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”