Market Loss Assistance Program in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,701
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar) totaled $20,035,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Arthur Courter | Alma, MI 48801 | $70,830 |
42 | Kendall English | Breckenridge, MI 48615 | $70,618 |
43 | R & T Murphy Farms | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $70,247 |
44 | Mark Chaffin | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $69,875 |
45 | Michael Chaffin | Alma, MI 48801 | $69,875 |
46 | Kenneth B Swanson | Old Mission, MI 49673 | $69,170 |
47 | Ernest Mogg | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $68,007 |
48 | Gross Dairy Farms Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $67,826 |
49 | Timothy L Buck Family Living Trust | Fountain Run, KY 42133 | $67,340 |
50 | Clarend Methner | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $66,459 |
51 | Engler Dairy Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $66,140 |
52 | Gerald E Clark | Alma, MI 48801 | $65,720 |
53 | Jeff Bosley | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $65,379 |
54 | House Farms | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $64,940 |
55 | Denis E Netzley | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $64,736 |
56 | Charles Humphrey | Sumner, MI 48889 | $64,016 |
57 | Schumacher Farms Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $64,006 |
58 | Jon Litwiller | Middleton, MI 48856 | $62,931 |
59 | Neyer Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $61,958 |
60 | S & T Farms | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $61,579 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”