Miscellaneous Farm Programs in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,512
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar) totaled $2,416,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Barry Humm | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $19,165 |
62 | Vance Humm | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $19,160 |
63 | Robert C Ross | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $19,100 |
64 | Jeffrey W Gulick | Merrill, MI 48637 | $18,889 |
65 | La Verne A Reeves | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $18,695 |
66 | Maynard Gross | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $18,388 |
67 | Lyle Rex Cross | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $17,492 |
68 | Keith W Goward | Merrill, MI 48637 | $16,816 |
69 | Bradley Dean Gross | Breckenridge, MI 48615 | $16,247 |
70 | Bebow Farms Inc | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $16,243 |
71 | Garry J Swetz | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $15,846 |
72 | Kelly Glover | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $15,570 |
73 | Larry Butcher | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $15,402 |
74 | Robert Bolt | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $15,276 |
75 | Rivercrest Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MI 48655 | $14,419 |
76 | Joshua V Humm | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $14,238 |
77 | Garry R Butcher | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $12,808 |
78 | Nancy Butcher | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $12,808 |
79 | William Roland Butcher | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $12,808 |
80 | Kelly Arthur Butcher | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $12,808 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”