Market Loss Assistance Program in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,701
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar) totaled $20,035,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Friesen Farms Inc | Perrinton, MI 48871 | $94,389 |
22 | Rawson Operation Inc | Farwell, MI 48622 | $92,905 |
23 | John W Crumbaugh Revocable Trust | Wheeler, MI 48662 | $89,452 |
24 | Jeff Bebow | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $84,669 |
25 | Longview Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $84,662 |
26 | Ronald Weller | Middleton, MI 48856 | $80,573 |
27 | Dusty Rows Farms | Carson City, MI 48811 | $79,157 |
28 | Bebow Farms Inc | Saint Louis, MI 48880 | $78,621 |
29 | Ridgeview Farms | Merrill, MI 48637 | $78,262 |
30 | Pohl Dairy Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $77,977 |
31 | Ronald S Ervin | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $77,660 |
32 | Klaas Vanderploeg | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $76,478 |
33 | David K Eckelbarger | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $76,368 |
34 | Ray Fricke | Sun City, AZ 85351 | $76,033 |
35 | Whitmore Farms Inc | Ithaca, MI 48847 | $75,263 |
36 | Rawson Enterprises Inc | Farwell, MI 48622 | $73,021 |
37 | Kale J Demott | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $72,952 |
38 | Mc Clintic Farms | Alma, MI 48801 | $72,430 |
39 | Cloyce Apple Jr | Elwell, MI 48832 | $71,762 |
40 | Gary Curtiss | Blanchard, MI 49310 | $71,645 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”