Farm Subsidy information
6th District of Michigan
(Rep. Fred Upton)
Total Subsidies in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 479
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) totaled $20,948,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | , | $117,497 | |
42 | , | $114,929 | |
43 | Phillip C Curtis Jr | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $110,440 |
44 | Piedt Farms LLC | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $108,159 |
45 | John Boynton | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $105,291 |
46 | Pagel Farms LLC | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $104,217 |
47 | Patrick E Hartmann | Lacota, MI 49063 | $99,938 |
48 | Edwin Albert Kerlikowske Sr | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $97,441 |
49 | Nick Totzke Farms Llp | Stevensville, MI 49127 | $95,967 |
50 | Louise Prillwitz | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $95,124 |
51 | Hillside Orchards LLC | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $91,127 |
52 | Daniel M Dominion | Benton Harbor, MI 49022 | $89,999 |
53 | Miller Fruit Farms Inc | Grand Junction, MI 49056 | $87,224 |
54 | Sunnybrooke Farms LLC | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $86,670 |
55 | , | $85,932 | |
56 | Schultz's Fruitridge Farms Inc | Mattawan, MI 49071 | $85,658 |
57 | Dale First | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $85,574 |
58 | Heater Farms LLC | Watervliet, MI 49098 | $83,074 |
59 | Reed Family Farms LLC | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $81,054 |
60 | Wayne Hosbein | Coloma, MI 49038 | $80,361 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”