Direct Payment Program in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,763
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) totaled $48,130,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | M K Peterson Farm Corp | Niles, MI 49120 | $165,286 |
62 | Best Brothers | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $164,939 |
63 | George Christopher Cropsey | Decatur, MI 49045 | $163,259 |
64 | Karla Mendenhall | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $161,613 |
65 | Hazen Harner Jr | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $159,794 |
66 | Michael D Stamp | Decatur, MI 49045 | $158,875 |
67 | Roger Stamp | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $157,926 |
68 | Lois Stamp | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $157,926 |
69 | Terryl C Rockwell | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $157,094 |
70 | Lichtenbarger Farms | South Bend, IN 46628 | $154,655 |
71 | Leonard A Kolberg | Bangor, MI 49013 | $154,313 |
72 | Gregory Tidey | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $152,692 |
73 | David Russell Cloud | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $151,461 |
74 | Larry Cloud | Union, MI 49130 | $150,434 |
75 | Jeffrey Lynn Tolbert | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $148,881 |
76 | Michael O Moore | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $148,682 |
77 | Ransler Farms | Gobles, MI 49055 | $146,673 |
78 | James E Truyaert | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $146,593 |
79 | R James Guse Sr | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $146,591 |
80 | Karl Alton Strefling | Galien, MI 49113 | $144,835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”