Counter Cyclical Program in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,159
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) totaled $9,329,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Christopher J Rajzer | Decatur, MI 49045 | $24,742 |
102 | Mark M Koebel | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $24,657 |
103 | Barbara Guse | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $24,355 |
104 | Jay Bradley Hemenway Jr | Decatur, MI 49045 | $24,274 |
105 | Michael O Moore | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $23,913 |
106 | Richard Paul Cripps | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $23,286 |
107 | Kurt Klann | Niles, MI 49120 | $23,199 |
108 | Lichtenbarger Farms | South Bend, IN 46628 | $23,188 |
109 | Vicki Lee Brossman | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $23,084 |
110 | George Clifford Brossman | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $23,084 |
111 | Herbert Miller | Niles, MI 49120 | $22,336 |
112 | Joseph E Young Jr | Jones, MI 49061 | $22,230 |
113 | Susan M Hemenway | Decatur, MI 49045 | $21,646 |
114 | Robert Charles Dohm | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $21,569 |
115 | Jennie Lee Crawford | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $21,567 |
116 | Paul Gerhardt Kugler | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $21,371 |
117 | Scott Doepker | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $21,185 |
118 | Scott D Mckenzie | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $20,738 |
119 | Norris Clifford Young | Buchanan, MI 49107 | $20,487 |
120 | Dean Leroy Luther | Three Oaks, MI 49128 | $20,392 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”