Counter Cyclical Program in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,159
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) totaled $9,329,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Michael Jeffery Primmer | Bangor, MI 49013 | $18,428 |
142 | David Dohm Farms Dohm | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $18,341 |
143 | Kenneth Cloud | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $18,249 |
144 | Joseph Roy Van Tuyle | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $18,187 |
145 | Dale R Klopfenstein | Galien, MI 49113 | $18,171 |
146 | Gary Lee King | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $18,161 |
147 | David T Demski | Sodus, MI 49126 | $18,074 |
148 | S & S Matthys Farms LLC | South Bend, IN 46619 | $17,898 |
149 | Terry R Deschepper | Edwardsburg, MI 49112 | $17,841 |
150 | Scott Deschepper | Niles, MI 49120 | $17,836 |
151 | Randall Lee Burger | Niles, MI 49120 | $17,777 |
152 | Mike Jasper | Sawyer, MI 49125 | $17,742 |
153 | Willis Lee Norton | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $17,652 |
154 | Christopher Lee Rosselit | Niles, MI 49120 | $17,603 |
155 | George Wuszke | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $17,553 |
156 | Andrew Stephen Pachay | Decatur, MI 49045 | $17,358 |
157 | Robert Lincoln Brossman | Union, MI 49130 | $17,238 |
158 | Joe Young Farms LLC | Vandalia, MI 49095 | $17,214 |
159 | Larry E Evans | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $17,203 |
160 | Barbara Albrecht | Niles, MI 49120 | $16,949 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”