Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton), 2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 143

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) totaled $597,000 in in 2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2023
1Schilling Family Farms LLCSt Joseph, MI 49085$43,403
2Maplewood Farms LLCCassopolis, MI 49031$42,840
3High Quality Farms PartnershipDecatur, MI 49045$39,346
4Ransler Farms LLCGobles, MI 49055$32,631
5Kirkdorfer Farms IncEdwardsburg, MI 49112$32,514
6Jacob SmithCassopolis, MI 49031$27,639
7Pace Family FarmsSchoolcraft, MI 49087$19,608
8C&d Mendenhall LLCEdwardsburg, MI 49112$16,813
9Mm Farms LLCWatervliet, MI 49098$16,364
10Latchaw Orchards IncBloomingdale, MI 49026$16,160
11Dentler Farms LLCVandalia, MI 49095$15,617
12Davis Pork LLCWhite Pigeon, MI 49099$15,577
13Hawkeye Farms LLCSaint Joseph, MI 49085$13,529
14Stocchiero Farms IncBangor, MI 49013$12,622
15Ellis Family Farms LLCBenton Harbor, MI 49022$9,985
16True Blue Too LLCGrand Junction, MI 49056$9,330
17Carol DominionBenton Harbor, MI 49022$8,636
18Cea Land Holdings LLCMarcellus, MI 49067$8,556
19Adkin Blue Ribbon Packing Co IncSouth Haven, MI 49090$8,446
20Antonio ReynaBangor, MI 49013$8,011

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag