Farm Subsidy information
6th District of Michigan
(Rep. Fred Upton)
Total Subsidies in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,115
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) totaled $50,249,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Ronald F Richter | Decatur, MI 49045 | $275,397 |
| 42 | Kietzer Farms Inc | Hartford, MI 49057 | $274,497 |
| 43 | Mckenzie Highlands LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $263,056 |
| 44 | Pace Family Farms | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $257,638 |
| 45 | Harner Farms LLC | Eau Claire, MI 49111 | $255,798 |
| 46 | Russell Costanza | Sodus, MI 49126 | $250,000 |
| 47 | Golden Plain Farms Inc | Hartford, MI 49057 | $250,000 |
| 48 | Hilltop Fruit Trees LLC | Hartford, MI 49057 | $250,000 |
| 49 | Walther Agribusiness Inc. | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $250,000 |
| 50 | Rj Blueberries LLC | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $248,992 |
| 51 | Jon Brian Hinkelman | Watervliet, MI 49098 | $237,085 |
| 52 | Lake Michigan Berry LLC | South Haven, MI 49090 | $234,392 |
| 53 | Silverstone Gardens LLC | Watervliet, MI 49098 | $233,435 |
| 54 | Kloosterman Greenhouses, LLC | Mattawan, MI 49071 | $228,581 |
| 55 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $223,735 |
| 56 | Degrandchamp Blueberry Farms Inc | South Haven, MI 49090 | $221,710 |
| 57 | Jacob Smith | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $215,890 |
| 58 | L H Piggott & Girls Inc | Benton Harbor, MI 49022 | $213,228 |
| 59 | Sparks Cedarlee Farm LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $207,850 |
| 60 | Coles Farms Inc | Niles, MI 49120 | $207,376 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf