Farm Subsidy information
6th District of Michigan
(Rep. Fred Upton)
Total Subsidies in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 840
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) totaled $11,103,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Berrybrook Enterprises | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $353,637 |
| 2 | Bryan Bixby | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $334,830 |
| 3 | J D Layman Farms Inc | Dowagiac, MI 49047 | $312,405 |
| 4 | Pace Family Farms | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $223,858 |
| 5 | Red Arrow Dairy LLC | Grand Rapids, MI 49544 | $213,074 |
| 6 | Arrowhead Vineyards LLC | Baroda, MI 49101 | $190,605 |
| 7 | Jeff Scherer Farms LLC | Bloomingdale, MI 49026 | $165,476 |
| 8 | Stocchiero Farms Inc | Bangor, MI 49013 | $159,079 |
| 9 | Marschke Farms LLC | Berrien Springs, MI 49103 | $153,874 |
| 10 | Ransler Farms LLC | Gobles, MI 49055 | $148,238 |
| 11 | Timothy C Hood | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $143,261 |
| 12 | Fruit Acres Farm Market | Coloma, MI 49038 | $140,983 |
| 13 | Leitz Farms LLC | Sodus, MI 49126 | $118,726 |
| 14 | Meachum Family Farms LLC | Hartford, MI 49057 | $116,821 |
| 15 | Sparks Cedarlee Farm LLC | Cassopolis, MI 49031 | $116,582 |
| 16 | High Quality Farms Partnership | Decatur, MI 49045 | $116,450 |
| 17 | De Groot Inc | Coloma, MI 49038 | $106,978 |
| 18 | Stark Farms | Niles, MI 49120 | $106,260 |
| 19 | Shine Farms LLC | Bangor, MI 49013 | $103,250 |
| 20 | Jeffrey Paul Stuck | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $101,837 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf