Farm Subsidy information
7th District of Michigan
(Rep. Tim Walberg)
Total Subsidies in 7th District of Michigan (Rep. Tim Walberg), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,612
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 7th District of Michigan (Rep. Tim Walberg) totaled $329,951,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jonathan Mattek | Riga, MI 49276 | $727,138 |
102 | Don C Neuroth | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $726,550 |
103 | Stoney Brook Farms Inc | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $726,549 |
104 | Gold Coast Farms | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $715,795 |
105 | Perry R Cisco | Hudson, MI 49247 | $714,934 |
106 | Timothy Vergote | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $712,625 |
107 | Bonnie Shepherd | Onsted, MI 49265 | $710,024 |
108 | Charles Mcmahon | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $698,105 |
109 | Neuroth Farms Inc | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $687,648 |
110 | Leslie Sieler | Adrian, MI 49221 | $686,843 |
111 | Malburg Farms Inc | Sand Creek, MI 49279 | $675,392 |
112 | Neal L Ulrich | Sand Creek, MI 49279 | $669,113 |
113 | Jeffrey E Ehlert | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $666,953 |
114 | Golden Valley Farms | Jasper, MI 49248 | $665,179 |
115 | Wolf Creek Farms LLC | Onsted, MI 49265 | $658,536 |
116 | Ivan Farms Inc | Britton, MI 49229 | $651,191 |
117 | Gordon Whelan | Tipton, MI 49287 | $647,101 |
118 | Galen T Engel | Adrian, MI 49221 | $646,256 |
119 | Debacker Farms Inc | Lyons, OH 43533 | $645,754 |
120 | John H Frayer | Adrian, MI 49221 | $638,826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”