Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in 7th District of Michigan (Rep. Tim Walberg), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 558
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in 7th District of Michigan (Rep. Tim Walberg) totaled $21,530,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Kory Alcock | Adrian, MI 49221 | $44,251 |
162 | Jerry Vanbrunt | Onsted, MI 49265 | $43,373 |
163 | Dalton Brian Goetz | Riga, MI 49276 | $42,308 |
164 | Long Haven Farms Inc | Clayton, MI 49235 | $42,055 |
165 | Mark S Oprsal | Adrian, MI 49221 | $41,990 |
166 | Charles T Ostrander | Onsted, MI 49265 | $41,820 |
167 | Roehm Farms | Clinton, MI 49236 | $40,177 |
168 | Gerard Zenk | Sand Creek, MI 49279 | $39,848 |
169 | Alfalfa Productions LLC | Onsted, MI 49265 | $39,775 |
170 | Swiss Cowbell Farms | Tipton, MI 49287 | $39,737 |
171 | Ford Farms Inc | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $39,324 |
172 | Hart Brothers LLC | Clayton, MI 49235 | $39,296 |
173 | Eric J Mapstone | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $38,722 |
174 | Ryan Mapstone | Palmyra, MI 49268 | $38,722 |
175 | Eric Amstutz | Clinton, MI 49236 | $38,019 |
176 | Mark Amstutz | Tecumseh, MI 49286 | $38,019 |
177 | Keller Farms And Supply Inc | Sand Creek, MI 49279 | $37,991 |
178 | Galen T Engel | Adrian, MI 49221 | $37,646 |
179 | Lawrence Wagner | Britton, MI 49229 | $37,593 |
180 | Raymond J Simpkins | Sand Creek, MI 49279 | $37,499 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”