Total Commodity Programs in 7th District of Michigan (Rep. Tim Walberg), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,619
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 7th District of Michigan (Rep. Tim Walberg) totaled $241,937,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Norris Klump Farms Inc | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $1,035,032 |
42 | Maple Row Farms LLC | Jasper, MI 49248 | $1,028,520 |
43 | Scott E Conrad | Metamora, OH 43540 | $1,013,721 |
44 | Sunryz Dairy LLC | Morenci, MI 49256 | $1,000,000 |
45 | Douglass C Wilkin | Britton, MI 49229 | $999,173 |
46 | Dusseau Farms LLC | Deerfield, MI 49238 | $981,319 |
47 | Cary Iffland | Ottawa Lake, MI 49267 | $964,289 |
48 | John I Tuckerman | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $949,778 |
49 | Triple K Farms Inc | Morenci, MI 49256 | $938,030 |
50 | Ohlman Farms Operating LLC | Tipton, MI 49287 | $935,070 |
51 | Witt Seed Farm | Jasper, MI 49248 | $906,556 |
52 | Beagle Brothers | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $904,685 |
53 | Iott Farms Inc | Deerfield, MI 49238 | $901,294 |
54 | New Flevo Dairy Inc | Clayton, MI 49235 | $887,326 |
55 | Frautschi Inc | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $882,882 |
56 | J & J Farms Inc | Britton, MI 49229 | $877,893 |
57 | Brubaker Farms Ltd | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $866,841 |
58 | Archie Lee Ross | Onsted, MI 49265 | $854,852 |
59 | Reed Farms | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $851,895 |
60 | Nick Thompson Farms Inc | Blissfield, MI 49228 | $847,483 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”