Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,485
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $69,384,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Quandt Farms Inc | Peck, MI 48466 | $252,937 |
22 | E T L Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $251,181 |
23 | Jay D Ferguson | Lynn, MI 48097 | $250,809 |
24 | Stone Brothers | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $249,708 |
25 | Holdwick Acres LLC | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $243,475 |
26 | Mcleod Farms LLC | Brown City, MI 48416 | $242,886 |
27 | Leslie Weiss Jr | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $242,557 |
28 | E & R Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $238,496 |
29 | Donald Koth | Filion, MI 48432 | $235,679 |
30 | Alvin Ferguson | Allenton, MI 48002 | $235,570 |
31 | Mc Of Mc Inc | Minden City, MI 48456 | $235,196 |
32 | Ken Miller Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $233,000 |
33 | Jeffrey A Furness | Yale, MI 48097 | $230,369 |
34 | Gerstenberger Farms Inc | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $228,516 |
35 | Ruggles Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $224,217 |
36 | Denson Smith | Caseville, MI 48725 | $221,944 |
37 | Murawski Farms, Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $211,556 |
38 | Banks Farms Inc | Brown City, MI 48416 | $207,289 |
39 | Scott Heussner | Marlette, MI 48453 | $205,687 |
40 | Mr John Ervin Strieter | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $202,003 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”