Production Flexibility Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,914

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $78,473,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
21Gerstenberger Farms IncSandusky, MI 48471$238,694
22John Gough Farms IncDeckerville, MI 48427$235,889
23Iseler Dairy-89Port Hope, MI 48468$235,204
24Pauline J Bischer GeigerRuth, MI 48470$230,907
25Dale Stamp FarmsMarlette, MI 48453$230,500
26Helena Valley Farms IncHarbor Beach, MI 48441$230,289
27Allan K Shaw IncMarlette, MI 48453$230,087
28Caister Farms IncMarlette, MI 48453$222,955
29Roggenbuck Farm IncHarbor Beach, MI 48441$221,728
30Denis WurmlingerCroswell, MI 48422$213,861
31Truman Albert TerpenningMarlette, MI 48453$209,575
32William George MccreaBad Axe, MI 48413$209,042
33Lena Margaret MccreaBad Axe, MI 48413$209,040
34Baranski Farms IncPort Austin, MI 48467$208,949
35Albert D TerpenningMarlette, MI 48453$206,849
36Buschlen Farms IncPigeon, MI 48755$202,810
37Holdwick Farms IncHarbor Beach, MI 48441$202,462
38Triple R FarmsSnover, MI 48472$199,302
39Kenneth Earl LandsburgSandusky, MI 48471$199,238
40Naomi Furness ThompsonYale, MI 48097$198,604

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag