Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,992

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $58,153,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
41Ken Miller FarmsMarlette, MI 48453$202,674
42Little-b Farms IncPort Austin, MI 48467$202,459
43Clear Creek Farms Inc.Harbor Beach, MI 48441$192,109
44Denson SmithCaseville, MI 48725$191,313
45S & I IncPigeon, MI 48755$184,768
46Helena Farms LLCHarbor Beach, MI 48441$178,129
47Helena Cattle Company LLCHarbor Beach, MI 48441$178,129
48Hass Feed Lot LLCBad Axe, MI 48413$169,895
49Gro Green AcresOwendale, MI 48754$166,380
50Van Vliet Dairy LLCDeckerville, MI 48427$159,600
51Guza Farms LLCUbly, MI 48475$157,512
52Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$157,242
53Krohn Farms LLCOwendale, MI 48754$150,318
54Loren Wayne IselerPeck, MI 48466$149,286
55Depcinski Farms LLCUbly, MI 48475$148,145
56Reithel Farms IncSebewaing, MI 48759$148,130
57Red Mountain Jerseys LLCBad Axe, MI 48413$146,332
58Kevin M PeruskiUbly, MI 48475$140,225
59Terpenning Farms LLCMarlette, MI 48453$139,876
60Noll Dairy Farms IncCroswell, MI 48422$139,658

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag