Counter Cyclical Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,607
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $17,917,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lena Margaret Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $47,268 |
42 | William George Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $47,268 |
43 | D & D Farms Inc | Ruth, MI 48470 | $47,046 |
44 | Banks Farms Inc | Brown City, MI 48416 | $46,503 |
45 | Bobbie G Parr Revocable Trust | Brown City, MI 48416 | $46,167 |
46 | Clinton A Stoutenburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $45,846 |
47 | Henry Albert Stoutenburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $45,846 |
48 | Mary Weiss | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $45,413 |
49 | Brian J Ingram | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $44,275 |
50 | Mcleod Farms | Brown City, MI 48416 | $43,994 |
51 | Baranski Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $43,864 |
52 | Greenfield Farm Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $42,651 |
53 | James Krohn Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $42,613 |
54 | Gro-green Farms Inc | Owendale, MI 48754 | $42,543 |
55 | Baur Farms L L C | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $42,484 |
56 | Truman Albert Terpenning | Marlette, MI 48453 | $42,457 |
57 | Albert D Terpenning | Marlette, MI 48453 | $41,956 |
58 | Holdwick Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $41,591 |
59 | Tanton Family Farms Inc | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $41,144 |
60 | Ernest James Hagen | Caro, MI 48723 | $40,841 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”