Deficiency Payment in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,244
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $6,548,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Duane E Koglin | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $17,407 |
42 | Kirkpatrick Farms | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $17,382 |
43 | Naomi Furness Thompson | Yale, MI 48097 | $17,028 |
44 | Edward Gibbs | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $17,022 |
45 | Holdwick Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $16,983 |
46 | Henry Albert Stoutenburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $16,910 |
47 | Gro-green Farms Inc | Owendale, MI 48754 | $16,863 |
48 | Alfred C Stuever | Lynn, MI 48097 | $16,541 |
49 | Hillock Farms | Jeddo, MI 48032 | $16,336 |
50 | Jerome Volmering | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $16,309 |
51 | E & R Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $16,173 |
52 | Big-b Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $16,164 |
53 | Jeffrey Jurgess | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $16,088 |
54 | Eric Joseph Hagen | Ubly, MI 48475 | $16,040 |
55 | Thuemmel Dairy Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $15,892 |
56 | Booms Silo Co Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $15,843 |
57 | John A Tanton | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $15,749 |
58 | Herford Brothers | Elkton, MI 48731 | $15,644 |
59 | George Kalbfleisch | Brown City, MI 48416 | $15,307 |
60 | Peter Wurmlinger | Croswell, MI 48422 | $15,141 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”