Direct Payment Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,027
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $117,937,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hwr Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $273,823 |
42 | Mc Of Mc Inc | Minden City, MI 48456 | $270,358 |
43 | Christopher Martin Guza | Ubly, MI 48475 | $269,251 |
44 | Holdwick Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $259,992 |
45 | Leipprandt Brothers LLC | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $259,672 |
46 | Richard Meikle | Lynn, MI 48097 | $258,193 |
47 | Mr Christopher Jay Jahn | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $256,894 |
48 | Schulze Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $254,552 |
49 | Jeffrey Brown | Grant Township, MI 48032 | $248,161 |
50 | D & D Farms Inc | Ruth, MI 48470 | $247,935 |
51 | Merle Koth | Filion, MI 48432 | $241,910 |
52 | Donald Koth | Filion, MI 48432 | $241,910 |
53 | Donald J Long | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $241,326 |
54 | Alvin Ferguson | Allenton, MI 48002 | $236,446 |
55 | Tom Haag Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $235,772 |
56 | Jon-bird Farms Inc | Kinde, MI 48445 | $233,781 |
57 | Paul Ruthko | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $231,994 |
58 | Busemann Cattle Co Inc | Columbus, MI 48063 | $230,874 |
59 | Ray Tosch | Capac, MI 48014 | $230,177 |
60 | D E Mann & Son | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $229,162 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”