Margin Protection Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 122
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $1,606,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Scharrer Dairy LLC | Minden City, MI 48456 | $15,673 |
42 | Gary L Protzman | Caseville, MI 48725 | $14,857 |
43 | Deann Protzman | Caseville, MI 48725 | $14,857 |
44 | Paul Leipprandt & Son Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $14,706 |
45 | Sharon A Collings | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $14,640 |
46 | Roy W Collings II | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $14,640 |
47 | Bradley R Peyerk | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $14,417 |
48 | Robert Frank Peyerk Jr | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $14,417 |
49 | Joseph A Kubacki | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $14,119 |
50 | Gary R Nugent | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $13,921 |
51 | Dorothy Sanford | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $13,858 |
52 | Peruski Farms | Minden City, MI 48456 | $13,371 |
53 | David Leavine | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $13,138 |
54 | Bradley I Stine | Ubly, MI 48475 | $13,111 |
55 | Welter Dairy Farms LLC | Croswell, MI 48422 | $13,072 |
56 | Brown Brothers Farms LLC | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $12,672 |
57 | Bender's Dairy Farm LLC | Croswell, MI 48422 | $11,996 |
58 | Andrew A Brown | Berlin, MI 48002 | $11,942 |
59 | David Heberling | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $11,445 |
60 | Daniel Schroeder | Minden City, MI 48456 | $11,146 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”