Total Conservation Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 678
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $2,680,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Richmond Brothers Farms LLC | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $12,070 |
42 | Kls Farms LLC | Elkton, MI 48731 | $12,042 |
43 | Thomas Fritz | Gagetown, MI 48735 | $12,030 |
44 | Robert E And Marlene M Smithers Irrev Trust | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $11,992 |
45 | Thomas Murray | Ubly, MI 48475 | $11,842 |
46 | Nancy L Gierman | Marlette, MI 48453 | $11,836 |
47 | Teschendorf Family Trust | Eastpointe, MI 48021 | $11,688 |
48 | Dean Jacob Polega | Freeland, MI 48623 | $11,358 |
49 | John Osentoski | Ubly, MI 48475 | $11,057 |
50 | Delfred Schram | White Lake, MI 48383 | $10,842 |
51 | Wayne L Church | Filion, MI 48432 | $10,741 |
52 | Twin Hill Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $10,644 |
53 | Lon C Kenny | Lapeer, MI 48446 | $10,606 |
54 | , | $10,577 | |
55 | Kermit Filion | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $10,499 |
56 | James Chinoski | Ubly, MI 48475 | $10,498 |
57 | Hilltop Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $10,028 |
58 | Peter Capling | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $9,961 |
59 | Gerald Smithers | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $9,951 |
60 | Betty Townley | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $9,879 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”