Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 720
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $3,097,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $11,117 |
62 | Philip Case | Filion, MI 48432 | $10,632 |
63 | Jeffrey Scott Finkbeiner | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $10,617 |
64 | Randy Desjardins | Brown City, MI 48416 | $10,430 |
65 | John W Barber | Peck, MI 48466 | $10,408 |
66 | James Abend | Palms, MI 48465 | $10,389 |
67 | Frank Arthur Stoick | Marlette, MI 48453 | $10,265 |
68 | Joseph C Sageman Jr | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $10,250 |
69 | Bender's Dairy Farm | Croswell, MI 48422 | $10,216 |
70 | Donald J Duda | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $10,126 |
71 | Thomas L Buschlen | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $10,105 |
72 | Michael J Wallace | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $10,105 |
73 | Robert V Krug | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $10,065 |
74 | Dale Christner | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $10,017 |
75 | Lane Colby | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $10,014 |
76 | Franklin Gaffke | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $9,872 |
77 | Gary Eggert | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $9,766 |
78 | Douglas A Hunter | Lynn, MI 48097 | $9,711 |
79 | D E Mann & Son | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $9,704 |
80 | Duane E Koglin | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $9,667 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”