Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,992

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $58,153,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
61Maple Grove Acres IncRuth, MI 48470$138,481
62Dale Stamp FarmsMarlette, MI 48453$137,376
63Grout Farms IncCroswell, MI 48422$137,142
64Kundinger Farms IncSebewaing, MI 48759$136,495
65Leslie J VolmeringHarbor Beach, MI 48441$136,422
66Greenfield Farm IncPigeon, MI 48755$136,025
67Richmond Brothers Farms LLCBay Port, MI 48720$135,484
68D & P Dairy LLCMarlette, MI 48453$135,081
69Kretzschmer BrothersBay Port, MI 48720$134,813
70R & G Hooper Farms, Inc.Deckerville, MI 48427$133,895
71West Farms IncCroswell, MI 48422$131,744
72Donald KothFilion, MI 48432$130,181
73Chris L KrozekBad Axe, MI 48413$129,756
74Leslie Weiss JrPort Hope, MI 48468$129,396
75K & J Farms LLCMinden City, MI 48456$127,615
76Gerstenberger Farms IncSandusky, MI 48471$121,386
77Bob Shinn Farms LLCCroswell, MI 48422$118,009
78Larson Farms LLCApplegate, MI 48401$117,278
79Mcleod Farms LLCBrown City, MI 48416$117,261
80Tom Haag IncSebewaing, MI 48759$117,054

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag