Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,485

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $69,384,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
61Ronald Hooper Farms IncDeckerville, MI 48427$163,730
62Stolicker Farms IncPalms, MI 48465$158,394
63Walls Brothers Farm IncCroswell, MI 48422$157,161
64Hwr Farms LLCMarlette, MI 48453$156,820
65Bay Horizon Farm LLCBay Port, MI 48720$155,971
66Helena Farms LLCHarbor Beach, MI 48441$155,713
67Tait Farms IncCaseville, MI 48725$151,041
68Dekkerland PartnershipUbly, MI 48475$148,981
69Bracken Farms IncSandusky, MI 48471$148,371
70Baranski Farms IncPort Austin, MI 48467$147,122
71Robert Haskin JrSandusky, MI 48471$146,991
72Kent Farms LLCKinde, MI 48445$146,183
73Richmond Brothers Farms LLCBay Port, MI 48720$145,749
74Phillips FarmsMarlette, MI 48453$145,622
75Sharrard Farms LLCPeck, MI 48466$143,757
76Rodzos Family Farms IncRiley, MI 48041$143,756
77Brad Parker Farms LLCSnover, MI 48472$143,723
78Gordon Brothers & Sons IncCroswell, MI 48422$142,001
79Ruczynski Farms LLCRiley, MI 48041$139,528
80Donald J KoningImlay City, MI 48444$138,681

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag